We'd also like to point you to our recently updated Cafe Press store, where there are new things to buy, and newer things to come back and buy more of!
We now return you to our regularly scheduled blogcasting...
May 05, 2008
When The Party's Over
Friday, 11 Reckning 2008
Well - Montreal has ended their hockey season by losing to Philadelphia in the second round. Hopefully there weren't any Car-B-Ques in HabsTown over the weekend - I didn't hear anything about it, but then again I haven't really been listening to much of anything since Saturday night. I did manage to catch quite a bit of the excellent games last night, although I didn't stay up until the wee hours of Monday morning to watch Dallas' victory in the fourth overtime period. And the next round is now ready to go - It's Pittsburgh against Philly in the East, and Detroit vs. Dallas in the West.
Congrats to everybody who has made it this far in the playoffs this year. I'm looking forward to a couple more weeks of good playoff hockey, and then I might be able to focus on more important matters.
April 29, 2008
Got The Funk
Fryday, 5 Reckning 2008
But it's not a good groove these days:
After winning the first game of the series in overtime, the Montreal Canadiens duffed the next two games of the series, and now stand in a 2-1 series hole that they need to get themselves out of if they hope to continue on the road to the Cup. So that beat is a bit out of synch with the rhythms of my heart.
I have also been sick with whatever bug has been going around lately. It will be two weeks Thursday since its' onset here at the Funny Farm, and hopefully I will be past the major situational challenges presented to me by this malady by then. Lots of coughing, chest congestion, sinus congestion, plus headaches, bodyaches, loss of appetite, and diarrhea. Sorry if I have not been inspired to contribute at any of the usual hangouts - it hasn't really been much of a priority of late.
And it's just more of the same old same old in the political arena: A rich white old guy who has been flying around the country in his wife's jet (in violation of his own campaign finance law) has dared to call one of the other candidates an elitist. And the major media are too busy drinking his (free to them) alcohol and eating his (free to them) food to call him on his incredibly hypocritical horse hockey. Oh, yeah - he hid his own assets behind his wife's skirts, and is not releasing her tax returns to the public. Maybe that bellweather of the mass media Chris Matthews can gush over McClueless for another couple of months while ostensibly being propped up as the everyman face of the Democratic Party. Or maybe we can get some more 'helpful advice' for the Democratic Party from Karl Rove in the pages of a major media weekly.
Then there was a co-worker, supposedly objectively neutral politically, who decided that he would spout Republican't talking points to me in an email discussion of the current political climate. Here's his opening salvo:
Tom and I were having a spirited conversation about politics and I was having a very hard time articulating my political views. I came up with an analogy to help that I thought you all might enjoy.
For me voting for McCain or Obama/Clinton is a lot like choosing between going hunting with Dick Cheney and going for a ride in Ted Kennedy's car. I hope that clears things up |
Then, he started to call in his Republican't friends to pile on. For some strange reason, they seemed to get a bit upset when I asked them why they supported letting american soldiers rape their fellow american soldiers (because, of course, they all believe that the reports of american soldiers raping Iraqi teens are just propaganda operations, put out by Al Qaeda, that liberals are only too willing to believe [due to their being traitorous surrender monkeys who want to install sharia in the courts of america]*) - and were surprisingly unwilling to examine any evidence I presented in support of my assertions. Along with consistently and constantly misrepresenting liberal viewpoints, and consistently and constantly spewing Republican't ones. To hear this from one of the many ditto monkeys in the office is one thing. But, coming from someone who (up until this incident) I believed was more or less objectively neutral politically (as he has claimed to be for some time now), and whose opinions I respected, this type of behavior has only reinforced my opinion that I should refrain from challenging the (Republican't) status quo within my place of business.
So, yeah - things have not been a bed of rose petals for Your Humble Narrator of late. And I have had no desire to burden you, dear reader, with a litany of my woes - and no desire to blow faux sunshine that's not smiling upon me of late up your a$$. Thus the non-updates you haven't seen around here lately. I'm hoping the Habs will give me some sort of positive distraction Tomorrow night...
* - seriously. Some of them honestly believe that I should be taken into custody because of the things I say about Putsch and the Republican't Junta.
April 22, 2008
On To The Next Round
Fryday, 28 Goodenuf 2008
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Montreal Canadiens 5, Boston 0. Even though my good friend Aislin seems to think that they've gotten a little too beat up in the process, I found quite a bit of hope in last night's game:
- Alexei Kovalev is a very talented hockey player, but quite often it seems as though he has motivational issues. And when he gets frustrated (as he was in the middle games of the series), sometimes he tries too hard to make things happen, ends up staying out on the ice too long, and then causes an odd man rush opportunity for the opponents because he's too tired to get back on defense quick enough. Or gets a dumb penalty due to having to resort to other means to stop his opponents when they blow by him.
This behavior came to a screeching halt when Saku Koivu returned to the ice. Besides getting back one of the best faceoff players in the game and a rock steady center who has no problem wearing the 'C' and playing on the fourth line if need be, Koivu seems to me to have provided just enough inspiration to keep Kovalev focused on the job at hand and more in control of his frustrations.
- Carey Price was absolutely unbelievable last night. As a former goaler, sometimes you notice a few things, and I noticed that he handled an awful lot of quick, up close chances last night. Someone parked just outside the crease, getting a quick pass in on the tape, and then taking one (or more) quick shots on the net. Those were among the toughest challenges I faced when I donned the pads*. And Price just shut them all down.
I was also remembering the draft last year - I was with a friend from Toronto in a shop on Queen Street when we heard Montreal take Carey with the number six pick of the draft. And everybody in the place stopped what they were doing, and we all looked at each other as if to say (and some of us said it anyway) WTF?!?. Shows what we know - and also shows us why we're not making draft day decisions for the Habs. Gainey and the rest of the staff involved in that decision deserve some big-time props for it.
- The Habs, even though they are still engaging in too much illegal shenanigans (slashes primarily, but that trip of Chara should have given Boston a potentially game-changing five-on-three power play), look to me to be trying to cut most of that crap out. I saw Koivu drag a couple of players away from after-the-whistle confrontations that might have cost them penalty minutes, and I saw them trying to make clean checks instead of going for the cheap shot.
I must say that I definitely noticed a marked difference between last night's game and the game five 5-1 loss the last time the two teams were at the Bell Centre. The game six 5-4 loss in Boston was one of the best playoff games I've seen this year, and let me hold hope that game five was the anomaly in the set.
Tonight's game between the Philadelphia Flyers (Eastern conference seed 6) and the Washington Capitals (Eastern conference seed 3) will determine the matchups in the East in the next round - Philly wins and they play Montreal (Eastern conference seed 1) - and the New York Rangers (Eastern conference seed 5) play the Pittsburgh Penguins (Eastern conference seed 2), but if Washington wins then the Habs play the Rangers and the Penguins play the Caps. Pittsburgh took out the Ottawa Senators (Eastern conference seed 7), and New York defeated the New Jersey Devils (Eastern conference seed 4) in their opening series.
In the Western Conference, the final game of the first round takes place after the Philadephia - Washington game, when the San Jose Sharks (Western conference seed 2) host the Calgary Flames (Western conference seed 7) in the seventh game of their series. The Detroit Red Wings (Western conference seed 1), the Dallas Stars (Western conference seed 5) , and the Colorado Avalanche (Western conference seed 6) have all made it to the second round, having defeated the Nashville Predators (Western conference seed 8), the Anahiem Ducks (Western conference seed 4), and the Minnesota Wild (Western conference seed 3) respectively. So, if San Jose wins, they play Dallas, while Detroit plays Colorado. If Calgary wins, they play the Wings, and Dallas plays Colorado (and Detroit would be the only higher-seeded team to win their opening series in the Western Conference).
Stay tuned, fellow campers. There's a bit of a ride ahead. I have managed to catch whatever's going around these days, so I wouldn't expect too much in the way of bloggy goodness on these pages in the next little while. So, take it easy, and keep your stick on the ice!
* - although the first Montreal goal, where Boston goalie Tim Thomas got caught waaaaay out of position while trying to move across the crease, brought back quite a few uncomfortable memories too...
April 15, 2008
One More For This Round
Fryday, 21 Goodenuf 2008
Montreal Canadiens 1, Boston Bruins 0. First playoff shutout for rookie goaltender Carey Price, and first Habs shutout in the playoffs since 1986 - at least according to my recollections of the stat man's prattling right after the game. Amazingly, as usual in hockey games, none of the announcers mentioned the possibility of a shutout on air during the course of the entire game*.
This could all be over for the Bears On Beans after Thursday night's game at the Bell Centre. I certainly think that a couple of days of focusing on why the frelling power play hasn't been working might be in order, but Monseiur Carbonneau certainly has impressed me so far with his coaching skills, and I would not presume to provide him** with any advice.
Thanks for a good game, and hope you're able to get your glazzies in front of a teevee that has the game on Thursday night. Share and Enjoy!
* - I counted. Twice.
** - unlike [shudder] Mario Tremblay, whom I did not hesitate to inform, loudly and insistently, from the other side of the telly, that his coaching skills (or lack therof) left much to be desired as far as I was concerned.
Off The Schneid
Fryday, 21 Goodenuf 2008
Well, it finally happened:
Boston Bruins 2, Montreal Canadiens 1 (OT). Not only did Boston finally beat the Habs for the first time this year, they were in the lead for almost a full period during the game.
You Humble Narrator would have provided you, dear reader, with this sports update sooner - but excessive celebratory adventures put me out of commission after Saturday night's overtime victory, and yesterday was (regrettably) spent getting back into the rhythm of the working week.
Game Four in the series is tonight in Boston, and Game Five is in Montreal on Thursday night. Share and Enjoy!
April 11, 2008
There Was No Joy In Beantown Last Night
Tuesday, 17 Goodenuf 2008
If you were a Bruins fan, at any rate...
Montreal Canadiens 4, Boston Bruins 1.
One of the more interesting statistics from last night: Montreal has never trailed Boston at any time this year. In the eight regular season games ([8 games] x [60 minutes per game] = 480 minutes of playing time in regulation [plus any regular season overtime [max 5 minutes per game]) they played this year, Montreal was tied with Boston for approximately 170 minutes, and in the lead for over 300 minutes. Even my favorite football team, the Miami Dolphins, were in the lead at some point during their season of futility.
I have already undertaken a wager with a co-worker who is a Dead Things Red Wings fan: whichever of Montreal or Detroit makes it further in the playoffs (Montreal goes farther = I win!). And, even though it might be akin to stealing candy from a baby, I would dearly love to make a bet with any of the Sadly, No! crew that are Bostonians on the outcome of the current series. How about it, guys?
April 07, 2008
Congratulations...
Friday, 13 Goodenuf 2008
To the Montreal Canadiens for distracting me from the incredibly depressing nature of the current soon-to-be-depression by having the best record in the Eastern Conference of the NHL this year.
![]() |
March 26, 2008
Standard Double Standard
Saturday, 1 Goodenuf 2008
It is nice to see that there are issues which I might be somewhat in agreement with a few of my compatriots:
A short while ago I postulated that, quite possibly, Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third might be in violation of his own campaign finance reform laws. While suggesting that the Democrats devote some effort to advancing this into the mainstream media
Sign the McCain FEC Complaint Letter
By his own admission, John McCain is breaking the law. His latest spending report has him $4 million over the limit he imposed on himself when he accepted public financing. We're not about to let this stand, so on Tuesday we filed an FEC complaint against the McCain campaign (check out the video of delivery above). Now we're set for a second larger delivery, on behalf of the thousands of Americans who won't stand by while John McCain breaks the law. |
Funny how it's only one part of the internets that wants to inject a tiny bit of bipartisanship into the presidential news coverage, and every other frelling news source available to the american consumer that wants to studiously ignore this sort of thing once again and continue with Keystone Kop sadministrations running this country into the ground. Sorry you couldn't get the writers to work on this script any sooner, guys...
They have a listing of the muckymucks of the left blogsphere who've already signed on. Quite possibly it might include Your Humble Narrator and a few of his cohorts at the American Street sometime in the near future - once they've figured out that we've signed on. Who's with me?
[Editors' Note: this entry has been cross-posted at the American Street]
March 25, 2008
Wholly Sweet Jeebus...
Fryday, 30 Priming 2008
...I wonder what the religiously insane will make of this?
Hotel ditches nightstand Bibles
Visitors to Hotel Preston won't find the Holy Bible in their nightstand. Instead, travelers will have to call room service to order it from a "spiritual menu," which will include other literary offerings like the Book of Mormon, the Quran and books on Scientology, said Dina Nishioka, public relations director for Hotel Preston. [snip] |
Equal time for other forms of religious insanity other than teh standard white jeebus on teh cross*? That PR director sounds like she might be of russian descent! Quick, spread the word - teh commies are trying to destroy gawd worship in teh ewe ess eh?!!!!!11!! Awake christian soldiers and kill other humans for teh grater glory of gawd!
I guess somebody should bind and publish the tenets of the Flying Spaghetti Monster so that this hotel chain could consider adding them to the menu.
* - fabulous prizes await any who can tell me where the original quote that has been shamelessly maligned by Your Humble Narrator comes from...
March 18, 2008
Quick Notes To The Bucket Of Crabs...
Fryday, 23 Priming 2008
...that is the Democratic Party of The United States* in this election year:
- in between all of your falling on each others' campaigns, making each other look bad so that you can become the nominee for the Democrats in November, you should probably pay more attention to the way your message is being distorted by the supposedly liberal mainstream media, less on publicizing each others negatives, and more on overcoming them. You are all playing the game by the Republican't rule book - and that almost guarantees they'll win. Step outside the frame a little, and perhaps try to point out the distortions the Republican'ts are making of each of your positions. It might be a good opportunity to try and get the frame of both Democratic campaigns uniting against the common enemy trying to pit you against each other. Especially when the Republican'ts distort your own campaigns so that you appear to be sniping at each other more than you actually are;
- you might be aware that Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third has publicly endorsed a couple of religious leaders whose views are at least as radical, if not more so, than the religious leaders the Republican'ts have unsuccessfully tried to tie to your campaign(s). It would be nice if you could perhaps mention that (and nothing else) if the media tries to toss this topic into the limelight any more;
- you might also be aware that the Dunsel In Chief has been lying, repeatedly, in public, regarding the date that his administration began illegally wiretapping american citizens. Perhaps you could ask him if he would tell us why his bluster about this program is conveniently obscuring the fact that his cabal has been engaging in illegal surveillance of americans since well before September 11, and almost immediately after he was sworn in - instead of his lie that this illegal government activity only started taking place after September 11? It might be a good idea to mention the millions of missing emails that this government has lost and loosely tie that albatross to this one if you could manage it.
Also: Quick Quick Note to Nancy Pelosi: Maybe we can finally find some reason to put Chimpeachment back on the table? Your form emails to me about needing more cash because of the eight times the Texas Souffle has vetoed your legislation conveniently forget to mention the dozens (if not hundreds) of times you caved to this petulant dictator-tot and rammed his legislation through your congressional process. You should be making him veto legislation daily, and loudly complaining about his lack of bipartisanship since the day he took office, from now until his miserable residency expires. If anyone sniffs at all about politics, you might start in on the record number of filibusters by the Republican'ts during this congress and take it from there. If people mention bipartisanship, remind them of the previous seven plus years of Republican't hyperpartisanship during this administration. You might even find it worth mentioning that your were elected in a massive mandate against BabyDoc Putsch and that you might actually consider using it sometime in the future.
- you might also be aware that Ralph Nader is being funded by Republican't bigwigs**. You might also notice that, whenever Nader talks about the evils of government and or the fat cat bureaucrats, he always uses Democratic examples, and rarely (if ever) Republican'ts when he talks about his presidential aspirations. Maybe you could ask him, publicly, why he enjoys keeping the real fat cats in power? Or possibly when he's going to start criticizing his Republican't donors instead of his fellow progressives - even once in a while would be a start...
- and, finally***, you might be aware that Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third has not released his tax returns - but for some strange reason all the supposedly liberal mainstream wants to talk about is your tax returns. Johnathon Sidney McCain the Third should also be releasing his campaign financial information, and is quite possibly in violation of the McCain-Feingold campaign funding laws. Maybe you could bring this to the media's attention as well - especially if, say, a corpo-weasel like Chris Wallace starts trying to get you to respond to a question with only his pre-arranged no-win answers as acceptable responses about your campaigns.
Best,
(: Tom :)
* - "I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat." - Will Rogers
** - yes, it appears that this is possibly some people employing the time-honored stategery of supporting everyone, so that, no matter what, they're backing the winner of the contest. The numbers and what little information can be gleaned at this point, however, point to quite a bit of that coming from prominent Republican'ts, so this uncorroborated report could be quite damaging to Nader if it is substantiated and publicized in the upcoming months.
*** - yes, it's a pretty long quick note. It's pretty quick for Your Humble Narrator, relatively speaking. And most definitely pretty short for the political attention span...
March 14, 2008
March 12, 2008
Quick Note To OUR Credit Union
Saturday, 17 Priming 2008
OUR Credit Union has also recently had its' name changed from the Royal Oak Community Credit Union, and their online prescence can be found here in case you'd like to ask them yourself about their business policies and practices with regard to the events and policies discussed here.
So, credit union people: when one of your customers comes into a branch office to cash a Western Union money order, it would be best if you didn't assume that they were some sort of criminal trying to pass off some counterfeit paper, and treat them like you're going to arrest them because the money order can't be verified by Western Union's automated system. Even if they look like a somewhat more respectable version of your basic long haired DFH* coming in to the credit union during their lunch break. And you don't immediately recognize them - mainly because they do most of their business with you online, and so don't generally visit the business units much.
Funny story about this situation (and a quick note to Western Union while I'm at it):
The customer 'service' representative at the the credit union (and the manager at the time), once they looked me over, subjected the money order in question to chemical testing to make sure that my counterfeit operation was using the finest materials, humiliated me in front of the other customers there, and repeatedly called the Western Union automated 'service' to be repeatedly told by their software that the money order in question hadn't been registered by the system, they managed to be civil enough to give it back to me and not call the boys in blue to haul my a$$ off to jail.
I then made my own attempts to contact Western Union and find out what the frell was going on. My first attempt got the same software telling me that the money order I was holding in my hand didn't exist in their records. Then, the first customer 'service' representative I talked to told me the same thing, refused to look into the situation any further, and, when I asked to speak to a supervisor once they refused to help me any more, hung up on me. The second customer 'service' rep wouldn't directly pass me on to a manager unless I told him what I was calling about. As soon as I said I was trying to talk to a supervisor about the lack of professional courtesy being exhibited by Western Union's customer 'service' people, I was put through.
It was almost like dealing with a completely different company. "I'm sorry sir - yes, that was unprofessional of them. Yes, I will pass your complaint along to the management responsible for promoting an environment that causes the peons to act this way**." I could smell the bovine excrement exuding from this corpo-weasel on the other side of the world while sitting in front of my PC at home. But, in the end, this individual was actually able to shed some light on the situation.
It seems that, for the most part, when you buy a money order from a Western Union agent, that agent is supposed to report the details of the money order to Western Union, so that they can update their database and verify the details to the businesses that cash it. The agents are supposed to do that within 48 hours of selling the money order.
Well, according to this Western Union manager, this particular agent at this particular outlet holds on to their transmissions for a week and then sends the bundled transaction information to Western Union once a week. So, if I can just be a little more patient and stop expecting companies to do what they say they're going to do when they say they're going to do it, everything will work out just fine.
Funny how the manager at the credit union couldn't get past the automated messages telling him that the money order doesn't exist in the Western Union database, like I did with a few phone calls. Funny how the default position for both of these business organizations was to assume that everyone involved (except them) was engaging in criminal activity, and treat them accordingly. And funny that I had to raise a big stink just to find out that some of the businesses involved were not behaving in the businesslike manner that they had legally agreed to.
I hope the credit union is equally amused (bemused?) when a long time customer of theirs takes their business elsewhere because of their corporate policies.
Update: Amazingly (cough), the missing money order data has magically appeared in Western Union's database within 24 hours of my inquiries. why, it's almost like their might have been some legally actionable avenues I might have been able to pursue if they hadn't gotten their act together post haste!
For some strange reason, this has not restored my confidence with regards to future business dealings with these organiztions...
* - Dirty Fcuking Hippie
** - and then he promised me a pony and a winning lottery ticket - so I quit my job in anticipation of the fabulous wealth I had just been promised by a complete stranger in frelling India. Not that I'm saying that I can't trust businesses when they promise to follow their own corporate policies, or anything lilke that...
March 11, 2008
Activist Critic Responds To Religiously Insane Bigot From Oklahoma
Fryday, 16 Priming 2008
Thanks to Pam over at Pandagon for posting the response of Oklahoma House Representative Sally Kerns (R [of course] - Religously Insane Hypocritical Bigot) to criticisms of her hate and lie filled eruption of theocratic bull$hit when she didn't think anyone but the Gawd Squad could hear her. I would like to respond:
To put this simply, as an atheist I believe christianity such as yours is not moral. Obviously, you have the right as an american to choose that lifestyle, but I also have the right to express my views and my fellow atheists have the right to debate these issues.
In recent years christian activists have increased aggressively promoting their agenda through the political process, often providing substantial financing to candidates who agree with their views, including many running for state legislative races. National publications such as PBS, CBS and CNN have noted that trend. That is their right, just as it is my right to voice opposition to your agenda, which I have been asked to do at several online public forums in recent months. That's what democracy is all about. It appears some christian activists believe only one group is allowed a voice in this debate. I disagree. A vigorous debate on an issue is not 'hate speech' – it's free speech. I have made clear my opposition to the agenda of christian activists, but I have never endorsed or supported any hateful action targeting individuals on the other side of this debate and never will. The fact that many religious rights activists claim anyone opposing their agenda is engaging in 'hate speech' says more about them than me. Most atheists are spiritually enlightened and believe that church and state should remain separate as enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, and that the U.S. Constitution is worth protecting and preserving. When I started writing, I promised my readers, and myself, to stand up for those values, and I do not apologize for keeping my word. |
Once again, for any fervent card carrying members of the Gawd Squad within eyeball range - my beef is with religiously insane idiots abusing religion in order to pursue their ungawdly misinterpretations of their big book of religious fairy tales, or trying to make their particular flavor of pagan occult superstition the law of the land. Those who keep their spirituality to themselves, and use it as a guideline for their own actions, instead of a hammer to bludgeon those with differing views, are more than welcome to continue their activities without complaint or issue 'round these parts.
But the motherCheneying farging icehole who wrote the original 'clarification' of her position on a group that does not adhere to her buybull's standards fits that bill to a 'T' and should be drummed out of the political position being paid for by taxpayer monies where she is currently 'employed' - let her religiously insane supporters use their church tithes to pay for someone to spew this kind of filth as part of their job. This sounds eerily similar to the racial hate speech coming from the religiously insane of the previous generation(s) to my ears. Amazing how, the more things change, the more they stay the same...
Continue reading "Activist Critic Responds To Religiously Insane Bigot From Oklahoma"March 05, 2008
Can't We All Just Get Along?
Saturday, 10 Priming 2008
I'd like to take this time to ask that, if you're interested in seeing a Democratic politician, instead of a Republican't, in the White House next year, please bite your tongue when passing along any slurs of the Democrat you don't want to get the nomination. Remember, Republican'ts will always slag any Democratic politician within range to try and distract from the crimes their people engage in when in power, and back away from discussions about the wrongdoings of Republican'ts when at all possible. They control the media, and, through it, the message, to a great extent. And, if that's how they're going to game things, then methinks it's high time Democrats responded in kind.
Somewhat earlier I asked the studio audience to consider focusing on the myriad of Republican't targets that are still sitting out there, instead of all this sniping between the top two contenders. Being that they're both head and shoulders above McClueless and the Anything-But-Straight Talk Express, or the other candidate that is being covertly supported by the Republican'ts for the third straight federal election, I see no reason to continue to try and play this game:
Guess what, campers? Those Republican't targets are still sitting there. And it looks like a few of the fat cats might actually be breaking into a sweat... The Sweaty Wrestler looks like he might leave no legacy other than another Republican't failure. The last of The Invisible Sky Fairy's Republican't candidates conceded last night. Perhaps somehow the dialogue can be shifted so that a few media spin cycles could be turned in this general direction?
So I would humbly suggest that the contest remaining is to try and be the most creative in bringing the myriad of Republican't misdeeds to the forefront from now on for Clinton and Obama. Which among you will be best able to tie the FISA scandal to the Republican'ts in the coming months? Who will best be able to make the public notice that, thirty years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, a Republican't-installed Supreme Court Chief Justice wants the courts to stop trying to get Exxon to pay the punitive damages (that have been cut in half over those years) that they've refused to pay for all this time? Who can point to the Republican't congressional obstructionism that's been going on since 2006 better? I think the nation's interests would best be served by trying to, you know, actually point out that we should actually prosecute actual criminal behavior by actual current administrations who are actually still actively engaging in it. I'd like to see the next president focus on that a bit in the upcoming campaign.
Update: Great minds think alike! And publish at almost the same time, too...
March 04, 2008
Unprecedented
Fryday, 9 Priming 2008
I am happy to inform both of my readers that, sometimes, companies that have previously been somewhat lax with their professional duties during their interactions with the Funny Farm redeem themselves later on. Let me tell you a little story...
About a year ago, I wrote a quick note to Randazzo Heating and Cooling about their service when they fixed my furnace and installed a humidifier. I thought I was going to be getting a deal from the company - maintenance and humidifier install for free if I got the humidifier and prepaid for two additional service calls right now - but later found out that the deal from the company was a slight discount on one additional service call if I bought the humidifier (and got it installed) from the service rep on the day of the service. After burning some vacation time to sit around waiting for the service rep to get to my place after it had expired, while I was having dinner. Because his office had seriously overbooked him (and all of their service reps, seemingly, most every day as a matter of course - funny how that's become the industry standard...), and nobody canceled that day. And then watching a $90 five minute service call: the rep pulling a furnace part, sanding the carbon off, and replacing it in the furnace.
Anyways,... long story short: I received some email from a customer service rep, which led to phone conversations (where I mis-stated the situation quite badly, I'm afraid. Sorry, Mike - I have put it together as best as I can now, and I'm sorry I was inaccurate in my recollections during some of our conversations), which have led to the customer service rep apologizing on behalf of the company, and some replacement maintenance parts for the humdifier (just received today!). I have updated my post from last year (the unprecedented part - rarely, if ever, are any updates done to posts, much less to posts a year old) with an account of recent activities.
My thanks to all involved on Randazzo's end for following up on this.
February 26, 2008
This Week's Sign That Putsch Is A Delusional Psychopath
Fryday, 2 Priming 2008
pRetzelDunce Unprecedented Failure Predicts GOP Will Hold White House. Excuse me for a moment: HahahahahahahaHaHaHaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! [wipes tears from laughing too hard] I've heard of some seriously clueless wonders in my time. But to say this, while enjoying (cough) historical lows in popularity - man, that's some Limbaugh level chemical refreshment going on there. Let's hear some more from Chief Executive Screen Door On A Submarine:
The Cokespoon Cowboy predicted Monday that voters will replace him with a Republican president who will "keep up the fight" in Iraq. "I'm confident we'll hold the White House in 2008," pResident Dunsel told donors at the Republican Governors Association annual dinner, which raised a record $10.6 million for GOP gubernatorial candidates. |
Also, a pony in every pot, and the Invisible Sky Fairy will grant your every wish! As long as you vote Republican't...
"And I don't want the next Republican't president to be lonely," the Texas Souffle said. "And that is why we got to take the House, retake the Senate, and make sure our states are governed by Republican't governors." |
Isn't it nice that he's worrying now, after he's trashed the party and ruined its' chances for at least the forseeable future?
He said Republican'ts still offer the bedrock positions that rich voters embrace: strong defense, low taxes and personal freedoms. |
Maybe he should take into account the views of the 80+ percent of the american people, who might slightly disagree on the bedrock positions that voters embrace, or even if the Republican'ts offer those positions. Especially considering that the Republican'ts have weakened america's defense, raised overall taxes (while deflating the economy and inflating prices. This is the true Republican't trifecta, folks...), and reducing individual personal freedoms for all americans.
"When I say I'm confident, I am so because I understand the mentality of the American people," pResident Clueless Moran said. "And I understand the mentality of our candidates. And there's no question in my mind, with your help, 2008 is going to be a great year." |
I understand that this is one of the first times the Idiot in Thief has used the word mentality properly. Unless the media has cleaned up the transcript again...
In Congress, Democrats took control of the House and Senate in 2006. Drinky McDumbA$$ has sought to remain relevant through his veto power and bully pulpit. |
Isn't it amazing how someone who never vetoed legislation brought forth by his Republican't lackeys when they controlled Congress, and now vetoes pretty much everything now that it is being brought to his desk by Democratic politicians, can be considered to be seeking to remain relevant through his veto power, as opposed to reflexively gumming up the words like a child engaging in a temper tantrum? Sounds like the liberal (cough) mainstream media is up to its old tricks again, and for such a supposedly liberal media, it sure seems to push the Republican't spin on this sort of thing.
I wonder what they would say if it was Democrats who were gumming things up, instead of Republican'ts? Oh, that's right - they still say it's all the Democrats' fault. Funny how that works...
"I believe the American people understand that success in Iraq is necessary for the long-term security of the American people," Bush said. "And we will elect somebody to the White House who will keep up the fight to make sure Iraq is secure and free." |
And I firmly believe that most of the american people have already figured out that the Man Who Drowned New Orleans is the worst president ever and has absolutely no clue about anything that comes out his vacuous pie hole. And that Republican'ts know this, but consciously lie their a$$es off about it whenever somebody calls them out on their lies.
February 21, 2008
Changing Of The Guard
Tuesday, 28 Shivring 2008
The Funny Farm Links Zone is an ongoing work, and often reflects the departure and arrival of new tenants on the Fashionable Left Bank of Blogistan relatively soon after I have found out they have vacated / settled in. Of course, I am occasionally a little slow in picking up on things. But I usually manage to get things done. Eventually.
So it is with a heavy heart that we bid a fond farewell to one of the mainstays round these parts, T. Rex's Guide To Life. You'll still be able to find his postings at the Florida Progressive Coalition Blog link that has now been added to the links zone, though.
I'm also somewhat sad to have decided to remove the Old Bald Fat Liberal (at least, he's one of the ones who admit to the title..) from the zone as well. Larry has had the muse dry up on him for a while. And it is truly sad to see that The Left has chosen to discontinue his bloggy goodness over at Happy Furry Puppy Story Time, and beg norbizness to let me know where he's going to be on Teh Intartoobz (besides in the comments of many of the blogs I frequent) from now on.
But, I am pleased to welcome (soon!) the Intell series of blogs as well as put up a separate Alternative Energy Links sub-zone (and humbly request that you feed me your favorite linkage in that area* by commenting to this post below) in the links.
I'm also thinking about a blog redesign that will minimize my page loads (yeah, I know - I should have taken care of it a long time ago), and another new sub-zone with even more reality-based content, to celebrate four years of internet hosting from Computer Tyme services. Feel free to let me know if you have any ideas on the subject that don't include spam-like objects (or, alternatively, feel free to test the effectiveness of the anti-spam system my host provides for me by including said spam-like objects) in the comments.
Things have been pretty sparse around this place lately. That's what happens sometimes when you're the only one at the joint. I'm thinking that it might be somewhat connected to the state of well being (or lack thereof) that occurs when I'm not in survival mode on a more or less constant basis and can focus on producing journamalistically infotaining blogtastical postings for all and sundry.
* - please put links in (at least) the form wwwdoturldotcom as opposed to using the href html tag unless you check your work. Comments with more than one link in them are not posted until I approve them. I know it's a pain in the buttocks, but I'm thinking of disabling links in comments altogether because of the spambots. So, if it is used properly it might be kept on on a limited basis. Just sayin'...
February 14, 2008
The Whole World's Watching
Saturday, 19 Shivring 2008
A big shout out to whomever it was in North Carolina Research and Education Network (NCREN), the individual who was referred here by Vitrual Pus*, the glazzies that viddied us from Lubin, Poland (as long as you haven't been sending spam our way), and someone in the UAE**, who have chosen to utilize some of their valuable time to visit this web site. Thanks for dropping by. I hope you found what you were looking for...
Continue reading "The Whole World's Watching"February 12, 2008
Stop Me If You've Heard This One Before
Fryday, 18 Shivring 2008
Wasn't it a Republican't spokesweasel who said "here are reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do, and this is not a time for remarks like that; there never is." when defending a Republican't government funded black ops campaign against Bill Maher?
The Putsch cabal knew they were illegally spying on us even before 9-11 and they actively used that knowledge to harass americans.
Congress (including my own supposedly Democratic senator) voted today to ignore the lawbeaking the telecoms have already engaged in. I cannot seem to be able to determine whether the changes to FISA will continue to allow the telecoms to engage in illegal surveillance of americans - maybe somebody can point me to the relevant portions of the bill? - but I also seem to be missing out on whether that is up for discussion..
All of which means that, among other things, all communications that involve an american communications device and a non-american communications device will be run through the Carnivore and Echelon applications at a minimum. Being a cell phone owner whose immediate family and most friends are resident in the Great White North, let's just say that I think I have reason to believe that I might have passed through the filters once or twice. Being a somewhat (cough) vocal critic of the people doing the monitoring has often given the denizens of the Funny Farm pause. But [matrix agent voice] I pay my taxes. So there's that.
Then again, just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean there isn't (at least one) somebody out to get me...
January 30, 2008
Mystery Revealed!
Saturday, 5 Shivring 2008
Well - I found out what happened to The Poor Man:
Why it is that I had to find this out myself, instead of being informed about it from the studio audience*, is beyond me...
By the way, there is lots of bloggy goodness freshly available at the blog formerly known as the Poor Man these days. In case you didn't already know...
* - of course, the studio audience which seems to largely consist of spambots sending junk emails to my comments section seems to want me to know more about unusual pornographic web caches and/or penis enhancement techniques than anything else. Unfortunately (for them) their services are not utilized, nor do they ever appear to be particularly imminent on the horizon, for any of the staff of the Funny Farm.
Somehow I don't think that will stop them from continuing to cybernetically harass me…
January 24, 2008
Quick Note To Roger Stone
Sunday, 29 Premise 2008
I'm thinking of starting a new group, called
Let's Impeach All Republican't Sycophants.
I wasn't really sure if I should use this picture:
or this picture:
What do you think?
P.S. I couldn't find enough room on a t-shirt to put
Completely Obvious Republican't Proves Orally Resourceful At Telling Evasions
While Helping Others Ream Everybody.
But I did find the right picture for this one:
January 23, 2008
Quick Note To The Vice pResident of The United States
Saturday, 28 Premise 2008
January 17, 2008
Compare And Contrast
Sunday, 22 Premise 2008
It seems that one of the Republican't sychophants over at the Conservative News Network is getting his knickers in a twist because he's been called on his shameless hyperpartisan fluffing of a Republican't candidate for president. You know, it almost makes me a bit nostalgic for one of the first major smackdowns we engaged in with a former news personality on Faux Snooze Lite. The haughty elitist ridiculing of someone trying to point out the discrepancies between CNN's spin and, um, the reality of the situation. The pointing to credentials that are supposedly above reproach because somebody's actually paying for this dreck to be broadcast - when infomercials are more intellectually honest than any of the Republican't bobbleheads at Faux, CNN, and MSGOP these days. The savage personal attacks the have exactly zero meaning to the discussion at hand - but do help an awful lot towards turning reasonable inquiries about supposed journalism from the mainstream media into childish temper tantrums from supposed professionals.
Could you imagine the (properly disdainful) response if a blogger had sent something like this:
From: A Blogger
To: A news personality on TV
Subject: excuse me? I don't read biased uninformed drivel so I'm a little late to the game. But a friend who understands what the real story you distorted was and knows a little something about how badly you missed the mark sent me a link to your ramblings. Since you are being paid to ostensibly report the news, not make it up out of whole cloth, this suggests you have journalistic training, and maybe you forgot that good reporters tend to do a little research before they spit out words. Did you think to ask me or anyone who actually knows something about this issue whether what you're 'reporting' was even remotely close to being accurate? No. (It was not; just a biased opinion that has already been discredited by those with knowledge on this issue.) Did you reach out to look for confirmation of the factually lacking statements you made in a national broadcast? No. Or how it might have fit in with other questions being asked by other journalists who actually practiced their craft with regards to this issue that day? No. Or anything that might have put facts or context or fairness into your report? No. This issue, for better or worse, has a very large body of work available for the professional journalist to produce an intellectually honest and unbiased segment on the issue for broadcast on your network. If you did a little research (there's that word again) you would find I have done my share of due diligence on this issue. Because of those extensive professional studies on the issue, you should be able to go into every report with a minimal summary of the reality on the issue based on factual data. Your reporting was incomplete and biased. The report you gave was aired by your network across the country -- so by all means it is fair game for whatever "analysis" you care to apply to it using your right of free speech and your lack of any journalistic standards or fact checking or just plain basic curiosity. You clearly know very little about journalism. But credibility matters. It is what allows you to cover major issues of the day and be viewed as fair and respectful, while perhaps a little ignorant, but willing to tell the truth no matter whether you like what you find out. When I am writing something that calls someone's credibility into question, I pick up the phone and give the experts a chance to give their side, or perspective. That way, even on days that I don't consider my best, or anywhere close, I can look myself in the mirror and know I tried to be fair and didn't make crap up just to support a partisan talking point on the issue, or because I like seeing my name on a website or my face on TV. |
to a journalist at a professional news organization? Yet, a professional journalist chose to respond to a journalist blogger (Glenn Greenwald - maybe you've heard of him?) in a similar manner to the parody email above.
Now, can you imagine what a hack and smear job Oh!Really? would do when he actually had some sort of factual basis for his spittle-flecked screeds, as well as something like this? Can you then extrapolate this 'journalistic integrity' so that you can get an idea of how Bowtie Boy's and Spammity's wild fantasies on the subject would be broadcast ad nauseum after that?
I don't want to tax your imagination too much, but I'm also wondering if you can imagine what the proper response to an email like this should be, regardless who was emailing it? Now can you imagine what the response should be to someone who also claims to be a professional journalist, when they send this type of email from their desk in between objectively (coughcough) broadcasting the news?
And people wonder why I am so much of a radical liberal that I don't automatically trust the objectivity of the employees of any major media outlet...*
Continue reading "Compare And Contrast"January 15, 2008
This Week's Sign That Putsch Is A Delusional Psychopath
Fryday, 20 Premise 2008
He thinks that, because he wants OPEC to deplete its' starting-to-dwindle oil fields faster, they need to pump more oil. Never mind that oil production capacity increases were larger than oil refinery capacity increases last year - so that increased production would be going exactly where? Never mind that oil production will be increasingly hard-pressed to keep up to current levels. Never mind that he's still pumping millions of gallons of that sweet Iraqi crude every day. The Ilegally Installed Drunken Cokeheaded Usurper wants him some more oil, so you OPEC guys better get hoppin'!
Continue reading "This Week's Sign That Putsch Is A Delusional Psychopath"January 12, 2008
Even More Religious Insanity In Action
Humpday, 17 Premise 2008
If you've been visiting the Funny Farm on at least a semi-regular basis, you probably might have guessed by now that the abuse of individuals' spirituality and faith by the various religious organizations out there is somewhat of a hot button issue 'round these parts. Being a (very) orthodox Catholic during my formative years might have something to do with that, as it enabled me to get a first hand perspective on the situation. Many have taken that to mean that I'm down on religion per se. That is not the case - if you want to believe that robots are stealing your luggage or that alien souls have been implanting themselves in human hosts for the past 75 million years, feel free to do so. Go ahead and have faith in whatever you think you should.
Having said that, the part that frosts my cookies is where those who are ostensibly leading their religious flocks start abusing that power in order to enrich themselves, persecute others, and/or justify their actions. Those that do this sort of thing, as well as those who (seemingly) are blindly following the dictates of their religious leader (when that religious leader starts engaging in this sort of behavior), are the ones that I refer to as the religiously insane. I have gotten a lot of grief from many who seem to be taking these kinds of statements personally. To them I say: if you are allowing your religious beliefs to influence your business activities, your willingness to obey the laws of the land when they do not agree with your religious beliefs, or your personal interactions with those who do not believe the same way you do (or engage in activities that your religious beliefs say require you to kill/ruin/persecute them), then, in my opinion, you are engaging in religiously insane behavior.
Quite frankly, one of the problems I have with those who I do not consider to have gone into teh gawd madness is that they don't seem to be too concerned with those who have been abusing their faith. This tends to make me think that they are somewhat in agreement with the more radical elements of their faith, and by and large wish that they would tone the rhetoric down (as opposed to wishing that they would discontinue it altogether). This, in my opinion, gives the more radical elements tacit support for their actions. A good example of this is the anti-choice position held by most religions. We'll be getting to an extreme example of their current activities, but for now let's just say that, because the majority of christians do not condemn these people for their militant (and borderline illegal) activities, those radical elements are not being pressured to stop pushing the boundaries of socially acceptable behavior. And so they continue to harrass those who activities they don't agree with because they think their Invisible Sky Fairy told them to.
Here's an example to show you when I consider this type of activity has crossed the line:
One of my siblings has told me, and I suspect the majority of the rest of my family would agree with him, that he thinks that Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ is just as factually accurate (if not more) than Michael Moore's Sicko. This is not religious insanity in my books. I do not think he is correct in his beliefs, but I don't think he's religiously insane because he believes what he believes in this instance. Now, if he were to be a member of the US House of Representatives, and he were to sponsor a bill that would legally define these two movies to be equally factually accurate, or he were to force others to watch either or both of those movies (for edumacational purposes), then he would have crossed that line and gone off the deep end.
Now, here's what has appeared on my radar this week which I would place in the category of religious insanity:
Apparently Someone murdered her children because she thought they were possessed by demons;
A man cut off his hand and them put it in the microwave because he thought it had the mark of the beast on it;
A man killed and cooked his girlfriend because he thought God told him to do it*;
A number of counties in Florida are trying to put religious dogma into science classes because they believe a "theory" with no scientific proof should be considered the same as a scientific theory with over 150 years of scientific data that supports it;
and, finally, in Orlando, Florida, anti-choicers put a billboard up displaying a dismembered foetus a few blocks away from the local abortion clinic. Just to drive the guilt meter up a few notches for those loose strumpets who dare to exercise their legal rights. A few anti-choicers have defended this practice by saying that, even if it's just one person that they can harass enough so that they'll be forced to bring a child into the world, it's worth all the nightmares that innocent children



















































