Who else could we be referring to other than The Poor Man's favorite wrongwing nutcase, Kaye Grogan? We were somewhat disappointed that the Editors (coughcoughyousecretidentityissafewithme!coughcough) could not be bothered to show the proper tone of disrespect towards her current venomous screed. so we decided to help out a little: Here's the original in all it's (cough) glory. We've thoughtfully added a few comments of our own below.
Third term presidency amendment idea . . . should be nixed
Kaye Grogan, January 24, 2005 If there is one thing the country doesn't need — it's a possible third term presidency from former President Bill Clinton. Why should he get a third chance to mess things up? It's taken awhile to restore things back to normalcy in the White House, as it is. Rumors are swirling all around that a compromise could be reached between the Republicans and Democrats, if some of the Republicans would help to amend the Constitution allowing former or current presidents to run for a third term, in exchange for amending the Constitution so Gov. Schwarzenegger of California, who is not a natural born citizen of the United States, can run for president, if he so desires. But wait guys and gals, before you get too carried away — there's this little thing called ratification before any amendment to the Constitution can be considered legal. And both proposals have about as much chance of passing through the required procedures successfully, as a balloon's chance of staying inflated after a pin puncture. Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, really needs to take a long rest, if he thinks the Constitution needs amending to allow California's Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to be eligible to run for president. Hatch is overlooking the whole picture. Has he stopped to ponder who else in the United States might be eligible to run under his ridiculous proposal? I think we have enough born in the good ole' USA potential presidential candidates, without allowing outsiders to be included. The country is already in enough trouble without adding more problems to accentuate the "not so positive" aspects in government. Somehow — try as I might, I can't visualize a pleasant picture of Arnold Schwarzenegger sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office. I just can't seem to shake the image of the actor as the "Terminator." Yes, I know Ronald Reagan was a former movie star, but he played out roles in a more respectful, non-violent fashion. Is someone paying these people to come up with all of these off-the-wall suggestions? Well, in Senator Hatch's case — yes . .. . you are. Many of the so-called constitutional experts are in agreement that Bill Clinton could be a viable presidential candidate again, if the 22nd Amendment was amended. God, spare us from that possibility! I know that Bill Clinton would love to make 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue his permanent address, but dream on. Maybe it's time some egos were deflated. Do we really need leaders who are self-serving and seek to puff up their own big heads? And do we really need a former president (who was impeached), to serve a third term? Two terms is enough for anybody to serve, including House Representatives and Senators. Term limits are needed to avoid congressional members from getting too "cozy" with special interest groups, and big businesses. No, term limits are not carried out in the voting booths. Some people don't have sense enough to oust bad politicians, they would still vote for them, regardless. Heck, Lizzie Borden could probably be elected to serve in a governmental position, if she had a "donkey" in her barn. Has Bill Clinton decided his former first lady doesn't have what it takes to get them moved back into the White House? It would be interesting to know her take on the idea of her husband being the president for a third term. But good luck on getting a straightforward answer from Hillary Clinton. Personally, I think the bottom line here is power. Being in control is the only thing that can satisfy the soul for some people, and many are in agreement this pair fits the bill for an insatiable appetite for power. The Clintonians need to work on not being so transparent, because I see them at the crossroads where you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time. And I'll leave it to you to decide . . . which crossroad they are on now. |
This has been a public service courtesy of the Funny Farm.
Editor's Note: this post has been temporally enhanced for your viewing pleasure.
Posted by (: Tom :) at January 26, 2005 05:28 PM