A few days ago, we wondered if there was a transcript of the entire testimony of a Scotsman on a horse Mr. George*** Galloway before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Through the good graces of Blaugustine and Simply Appaling (who actually did the heavy lifting on this one), we are now able to show you a link to the transcript of the entire hearing that day. Funny how the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs can't seem to find neither Galloway's statement, nor this transcript. Funny how they weren't able to transcribe the one days' testimony that shows how hypocritical and small-minded they are.
Here are some of the highlights which we find to be particularly illuminating regarding the unbridled hypocrisy of Senator Norm Coleman** in trying to blame Mr. Galloway for practices he himself engaged in:
[-snip-] SEN. COLEMAN: Mr. Zureikat was a significant contributor to Mariam's Appeals. Is that correct? GALLOWAY: He was the second biggest contributor. The main contributor was Sheik Zayed, the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, which you've glossed over in your report because it's slightly embarrassing to you. And the third major contributor was the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, which you've equally glossed over because it's embarrassing to you. [-snip-] SEN. COLEMAN: I turn to Exhibit 12. And that purports again to be a stamp of the Ministry of Oil of Iraq and this purports to be showing the details of a contract signed with Middle East ASI company, Mr. George Galloway and Fuwaz Zureikat. So Middle East ASI is Mr. Zureikat's company? GALLOWAY: Middle East ASI is Mr. Zureikat's company. He may well have signed an oil contract. It had nothing to do with me. SEN. COLEMAN: He was chair of Mariam's Appeals in 2000. I take it you knew him well. Did he ever talk with you about his dealings with oil in Iraq? GALLOWAY: He did better than that. He talked to everybody. He talked to every English journalist that came through Baghdad--who he helped at our request to get the interviews and to get to the places that they wanted and needed to go. He was introduced to everyone as a major benefactor of the Mariam Appeal and as a businessman doing extensive business in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. SEN. COLEMAN: I'm asking you specifically, In 2001 were you aware he was doing oil deals with Iraq? GALLOWAY: I was aware that he was doing extensive business with Iraq. I did not know the details of it. It was not my business. SEN. COLEMAN: So this is somebody who was the chairman of committee that you know well and you're not able to say that he was... GALLOWAY: Well, there's a lot of contributors - I've just been checking -- to your political campaigns. SEN. COLEMAN: There's not many at that level, Mr. Galloway - GALLOWAY: I've checked your website. There are lots of contributors to your political campaign funds. I don't suppose you ask any of them how they made the money they give you. SEN. COLEMAN: Certainly not at $600,000 American. But let me ask you again, just so that the record is clear--that it's clear on the record--that you're not contesting then the validity of Document 12, Exhibit 12. You're indicating that Mr. Zureikat could have had dealings with Iraq. You're saying that at that point in time you're not aware that he had oil dealings with Iraq? GALLOWAY: First of all, I've only seen this document today. And I'm telling you that insofar as my name is in a parenthesis the information in it is false. I've no reason to believe that Mr. Zureikat's company didn't do that particular oil deal. But this is your problem in this whole affair. There is nobody arguing that Mr. Zureikat's company did not do oil transactions and many other--much bigger, frankly--business contracts with Iraq. There is nobody contesting that Mr. Zureikat made substantial donations to our campaign against sanctions and war. My point is--you have accused me, personally, of enriching myself, of taking money from Iraq. And that is false and unjust. [-snip-] SEN. LEVIN: here were a lot of things you opposed, but you don't believe should be circumvented in illegal ways. Isn't that-- GALLOWAY: But, please, Senator! You supported the illegal attack on Iraq. Don't talk to me about illegality-- SEN. LEVIN: Sorry about that. I didn't. But that's beside the point. [Crosstalk] That's beside the point. You're wrong in your-- GALLOWAY: Well, I'm collectively talking about the Senate. Not you personally. SEN. LEVIN: Well, that's okay. Let me go back to my question. I don't want to get involved in-- GALLOWAY: Why not? You want to talk about illegality? SEN. LEVIN: No. GALLOWAY: You launched an illegal war, which has killed a 100,000 people. You want me to be troubled? SEN. LEVIN: No, I want you to answer questions which are fairly put and directly in front of you. Now I'll ask you one last--two last questions. If--if--Mr. Zureikat's contribution to Mariam's Appeal came from the sale of oil--or his share of the sale from oil--which he was able to obtain because he paid a kickback in violation of the U.N. program. Would that contribution trouble you? That's my question. [-snip-] |
There's much more dissembling to cover up the fact that the United states is the guiltiest entity in the UN Oil for Food scandal. Sorta like when other Repugnicant house members brought their mistresses in to watch the Clenis impeachment congressional circus.
Speaking of immoral hypocritical Repugnicants, we have heard veiled references to Mr. Coleman's somewhat, um, unorthodox open marriage and his habit of bringing twentysomething tartlets to B&D clubs in Minnesota - from Garrison Keillor no less - that confirm the unsubstantiated rumor we heard last year from a Minnesotan who is involved in the scene. Wouldn't it be interesting to have some video footage of Senator Coleman (R - Whips and Chains) entering and/or exiting said club with a non-wife on his arm? Wethinks that it might help the American public understand the moral imperatives of the junta currently running our country (into the ground).
* - y! sctw!
** - Norm!
What's going down, Mr. Coleman?
My career in white hot flames, Woody...
*** - Ouch! Dyslexia lures. Minor spelling edits (that hopefully themselves do not add even more dyslexic hits to our total) have been corrected in the original 20050603 1730 EDT.
Posted by (: Tom :) at May 25, 2005 08:37 PM