Friday, 9 Infusion 2006
Another fine example of conervative family values in action:
Documents show issues with wives, child support By Caitlin Rother, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER, June 2, 2006 Republican Jim Galley, who is running for Congress as a "pro-traditional family" candidate, was married to two women at the same time, defaulted on his child support payments and has been accused of abuse by one of his ex-wives. [snip] Galley married his second wife, Beth, in 1982 when, unbeknownst to her, he was still married to his first wife, Terry. Beth and Galley divorced in 1990 after she sought a restraining order alleging abuse. The child support was owed to his first wife. Galley said the contemporaneous marriages were a mistake because he thought his first divorce had been completed. He said the child support default was only for a few months and that the abuse allegation was made only to get him out of the house. [snip] Although Galley, 50, has never held elective office, his campaign Web site says he is endorsed in Tuesday's primary election by a number of current and former Republican elected officials from San Diego County. They include former Rep. Brian Bilbray, who is running to replace imprisoned former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham in the 50th District; former Assemblyman Howard Kaloogian; El Cajon Councilman Bob McClellan; and Assemblymen George Plescia and Mark Wyland. The site says Bruce Ruff, who is challenging Sheriff Bill Kolender, has also endorsed him. [snip] Terry and Galley had been separated for about seven months when he married Beth in February 1982. Terry said she filed for divorce but the papers her Legal Aid attorney sent for Galley's signature weren't returned. When Galley's mother told Terry that he had remarried, Terry said she called to remind him they were still married and asked him to sign the divorce papers. The divorce was final in July 1983, 17 months after he had married Beth. (Galley and Beth married again in a confidential ceremony in August 1984.) Terry said she went on welfare after she separated from Galley in July 1981. She provided Michigan court records to show Galley defaulted on support payments for their two children in the 1980s, which forced the Michigan welfare system to obtain the money through legal proceedings. When asked about the child support, Galley first said he was only in default for several months because of a back injury. He later acknowledged that money was garnisheed from his paychecks for four years but said it was because of a billing mix-up and his money was ultimately refunded. However, Beth, who is now Beth Bradford and lives in Santee, said Galley told her he couldn't afford the support payments to Terry because he was supporting Beth's two children. Galley said that when he married Beth, "I had honestly thought that my divorce had gone through on the first marriage." Galley is married to his third wife, Carol. In addition to his "pro-traditional family" stance, Galley promotes his belief in a "strong military." During interviews, Galley has touted his military service as an advantage over other candidates in the congressional race, saying he was drafted by the Navy during the Vietnam War. His Web site states, "I was drafted it (sic) to the Navy, serviced my time," and then later joined the Army. Galley's military records, obtained by the Union-Tribune through a Freedom of Information Act request, show he started his Navy service April 29, 1974, and was discharged less than six weeks later, while in "recruit training." Navy spokesman Lt. William Marks said the Navy stopped the draft July 1, 1973, nine months before Galley started his Navy service. When asked about the discrepancy, Galley insisted that he was drafted, saying he was notified partway through training camp that the Navy had a "reduction in force" and no longer needed him. [snip] |
A few thoughts:
- this guy sounds pretty shady, and of dubious character. I would especially think that for a supposed traditional values christian to skip out on parental responsibilities, engage in bigamy and adultery, and misrepresent his military service, would be an almost automatic disqualifier for the guy. It sounds like he was forced to make some of his child support payments because he was trying to duck out of them, too. This is how to take responsibility for the children you bring into the world?
- if the details are accurate, hasn't this person broken the law? I would think that others who were married to two people at once were charged with something, and maybe some of them were convicted of a crime, but I do not know one way or the other. I can also understand if someone honestly thought that their divorce had gone through on the first marriage. But I also thought that those were the kind of pesky fact things that we're supposed to make sure of before we make a mistake and marry two women at the same time, and if you tried to take it on faith, you could be prevented from getting married the second time. And that if the facts were discovered along the way, so to speak, there would be other fact things like court records and fines and perhaps even criminal records available to verify or refute this sort of thing. And also that this would not have to be classified due to matters of national security, so we could be allowed to know how the frell somebody was able to marry two women at the same time and not spend time in the clink or have fabulous amounts of alimony and child support for the two ex-families he abandoned.
- this sounds like another Repugnicant bastich who ducked his military service, and is now lying his a$$ off about it. At least he didn't go AWOL like some drunken cokeheaded usurpers we could mention - he didn't even make it through boot camp!
Thanks to Susie the Suburban Guerrilla for pointing me towards this story.
Posted by (: Tom :) at June 3, 2006 12:30 AM